Same Article, Different Views

When Zinczenko says that there are no healthy alternatives to fast-food available, I have to disagree. In his article, he claims that one will see more than 13,000 McDonald's while driving down a thoroughfare but what about Subway? There are Subways every couple of blocks, and it is definitely a healthier alternative than McDonald's. Some may argue that the calories still build up, but that is all dependent upon the customer. The customer needs to be conscientious in his decisions or ANY restaurant and become unhealthy.
Another alternative to unhealthy fast-food restaurants is to grab something healthy from home before you leave the house. This may take a little more work, but it is the easiest way to control one's calorie intake. Although Zinczenko firmly believes the blame should be put on the restaurants, i believe it is solely the responsibility of one's self, or their parents, to make sure they are eating right.


********************************************************************

I see where Zinczenko is coming from when he blames fast-food companies for this country's rise in obesity. Even fast-food restaurants that serve salads or claim to have a "healthy menu" hide the fact that these items really aren't that healthy. Although I feel that fast-food companies are to be blamed, I don't agree that bringing a lawsuit against the company is the right solution. Again, i feel that, ultimately, it is the responsibility of one's self or their parents to watch what is being consumed. There will always be an alternative to fast-food restaurants, whether it be healthy restaurants or buying food from a grocery store. A question that arises here is will suing the company really make a difference? i feel that even if menus change, people will still opt for the unhealthy choices. We need to make better choices as humans and care for our health.